Artificial intelligence (AI) is an emotionally and politically charged technology, slowly becoming a focal point of every sector’s advancement. This is also happening in video games, where developers are using it to make assets, design characters, generate code, and more. The feelings around these use cases differ from continent to continent, and this is due to the relationships gaming companies have with their audiences.
Differences in AI sentiment in the global gaming market
The attitude about AI in video games shifts drastically around the world. The Asian gaming market is far more enthusiastic about its incorporation, with widespread buy-in to help its proliferation. The West is more skeptical, discouraging its use in game development, as seen at recent award shows, where titles like Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 have had their accolades revoked after it was discovered that the teams used generative AI.
Meanwhile, China is attempting to leverage AI as a competitive badge of honor. Its gaming market is the largest in the world, valued at $46.8 billion and serving 679 million users. It is also one of the most committed to using AI in games, making it easy to see a potential correlation.
With the sector already being lucrative in the region, companies seek to multiply those successes by discovering AI improvements. AI can help deliver more content to customers faster. This includes new games, as well as updates, upgrades, and downloadable content powered by generative AI. This could hasten timelines, especially for live-service games, keeping player bases more engaged for longer.
How Asia accepted AI into game development
Asia has embraced AI in the sector because it has a more positive outlook on the technology overall, including applications beyond video games. Asian countries have confidence and faith in it, whereas countries like Brazil and the United Kingdom are less so. People in the U.S. are also less likely to incorporate AI into their daily lives compared to those in eastern nations.
The East has done more than use AI in making video games — it has made them an integral part of storytelling. In the extraction shooter Synduality: Echo of Ada, players work alongside an AI partner to amplify their combat. Rather than being an element that might deter gamers from purchasing, it has become a selling point. AI could also be used to make non-player characters (NPCs) more responsive, dynamic, and lifelike.
Another example is inZoi from the South Korean developer Krafton. The game is a direct competitor to The Sims, one of the most well-known simulation series of all time. Krafton has decided to revise players’ understandings of NPCs by calling them co-playable characters (CPCs). In the game, the CPCs are reactive to stimuli, responding to circumstances and player actions in a more humanlike fashion. Eventually, this behavior will be incorporated into other games as Krafton collaborates with NVIDIA, an AI powerhouse.
Concerns gamers have about AI in gaming
While Asian countries are more willing to embrace AI in video games, there are global apprehensions. One of the major fears among industry creatives is job displacement. A survey from the 2026 Game Developers’ Conference discovered 52 percent of respondents claimed AI is having an adverse impact on the field. Many gamers see the medium as a representation of human innovation and artistry, and it is arguable that AI devalues these efforts.
Similarly, people value human-made products over those produced by AI. Of 1,008 respondents from the U.S., 52 percent of them said they would rather watch a movie with a seven out of 10 rating made by people than a nine out of 10 movie made by AI.
Keeping AI out of art also eliminates customer worries over stolen work and plagiarism. Fans did not respond kindly to China’s Heroes of Jin Yong when they discovered AI was involved. This backlash ruined the game’s rollout, tarnishing its reputation by becoming known as derivative rather than original and groundbreaking.
Finally, there is a question of whether AI could be used even more harmfully. Video games are already questionably addictive, and using algorithms to adjust gameplay experiences to make them even more immersive could be a manipulative tactic. Eventually, this will erode trust between developers and gamers.
Gaming the system
Every sector is growing with AI, and so are its customers. They are unraveling their complex feelings about its implementation, and developers are striving to find the most ethical and productive ways to incorporate it. Some regions are excelling more than others at aligning corporate and competitive motivations with customer attitudes. Only time will tell if Western skepticism regarding AI will soften in the gaming industry, following Asia’s example. Or, the division could become even more stark, catapulting each side of the world onto different trajectories in gaming.
Zac Amos is the Features Editor at ReHack Magazine, where he covers business tech, HR, and cybersecurity. He is also a regular contributor at AllBusiness, TalentCulture, and VentureBeat. For more of his work, follow him on X (Twitter) or LinkedIn.
TNGlobal INSIDER publishes contributions relevant to entrepreneurship and innovation. You may submit your own original or published contributions subject to editorial discretion.
Featured image: Sean Do on Unsplash