For years, the world has been obsessed with size. Bigger language models. Bigger datasets. Bigger promises. Each new generation of AI is trained on trillions of parameters and hailed as a leap toward artificial general intelligence. But when I speak to business leaders, their questions sound nothing like those headlines.
They ask, “How can AI help my finance team close books faster?” “Can it reduce manual errors?” “Can it make my operations team less dependent on constant approvals?”
These are practical, grounded needs, not grand philosophical debates. And yet, most of today’s AI infrastructure isn’t designed for them. The next leap forward, I believe, won’t come from making models larger, but from making systems smaller, more specialized, and capable of working together inside real businesses.
The myth of scale
In the early days of deep learning, scaling was everything. The more data you had, the more accurate your models became. But that approach came with trade-offs: higher costs, slower iteration, and a growing gap between what AI could do in a lab and what it could actually achieve inside a company.
The average enterprise doesn’t need a model that can write poetry or solve philosophy questions. It needs an AI that can reconcile invoices at 3 p.m. without breaking compliance rules. That’s not a limitation. It’s clarity.
The pursuit of “bigger” has distracted the industry from what truly matters: usability, governance, and integration. I’ve seen small, purpose-built agents outperform massive systems simply because they were designed to live inside existing workflows instead of replacing them.
In that sense, the future of AI won’t be defined by scale. It will be defined by context.
The shift toward multi-agent intelligence
Think of today’s AI systems as single, powerful specialists, but ones that struggle with teamwork. A model might be brilliant at analysing documents but completely unaware of the approval process those documents belong to.
The next evolution is a multi-agent ecosystem, where smaller AI systems handle specific functions and communicate seamlessly with one another. One agent manages data extraction. Another handles compliance checks. A third coordinates reporting. Together, they replicate the flow of human collaboration, but faster, more consistently, and without burnout.
When agents share context instead of competing for control, organizations can build intelligence layer by layer, rather than gambling on one all-encompassing solution.
What business leaders should focus on
The most common question I hear from leaders today is: “Where do we even start?”
My answer is always the same, start with a process, not a platform.
AI should never begin as a purchase; it should begin as a converzation. Identify one workflow that consistently drains time and morale. Map out who’s involved, what slows it down, and where the repetitive decisions happen. Then ask: what would change if an intelligent agent could take over that part reliably?
Success in AI is rarely about radical transformation. It’s about compounding small wins. When an organization sees one automated workflow save a few hours each week, that proof of value becomes the foundation for everything else. It also reframes AI from being an abstract concept to something concrete, something that quietly improves daily work.
From centralization to collaboration
For decades, technology adoption inside companies followed a predictable pattern: centralize the tools, consolidate the systems, standardize the workflows. AI challenges that logic.
The most effective AI deployments I’ve seen don’t centralize, they collaborate. They let specialized systems handle narrow tasks autonomously, yet remain transparent and auditable. Instead of one massive platform, you get a distributed network of intelligent assistants, each accountable to the same governance layer.
That shift mirrors how modern teams operate. We’ve learned that small, empowered teams can outperform large, rigid hierarchies. The same is becoming true for AI.
The new definition of ROI
In traditional automation, return on investment (ROI) was easy to measure: fewer people, faster processes, lower costs. AI changes that equation.
A well-designed AI system doesn’t just save time; it changes how time is used. It shifts focus from administrative work to analytical thinking, from micromanagement to decision-making. That kind of ROI is harder to measure but far more transformative.
When I evaluate an AI deployment, I don’t just look at efficiency metrics. I look at whether the system:
- Reduced human bottlenecks in decision cycles;
- Improved data visibility for managers;
- Built employee confidence in automated outcomes.
If those indicators move, the financial returns will follow. If they don’t, the technology may be running, but the organization isn’t moving forward.
Why Asia has a unique opportunity
Having built systems for clients across the US and Asia, I’ve noticed a fundamental difference: Asian companies tend to adopt technology pragmatically. They care less about being first and more about what works. That gives the region an unexpected advantage in the coming AI wave.
Unlike mature markets where legacy systems run deep, many Asian SMEs are still building their digital foundations. They can skip the detours, adopting workflow-native AI directly rather than layering it on outdated infrastructure.
This agility makes Asia one of the most exciting grounds for applied AI innovation. Instead of chasing theoretical general intelligence, regional businesses can lead in practical, production-grade AI systems that move from prototype to value faster than anywhere else.
Responsible intelligence starts small
AI ethics and governance are often framed as massive policy debates, but responsibility starts with design. A transparent system isn’t just a moral choice; it’s an operational one.
When every AI decision is traceable, reversible, and verifiable, people learn to trust it. That’s when adoption scales naturally. But when the process is opaque, fear replaces curiosity, and innovation slows.
The answer isn’t to regulate innovation out of existence; it’s to build responsibility into the system itself, one workflow, one audit trail at a time.
A more human future for AI
I often think of AI not as replacing people but as redistributing their energy. The best systems don’t eliminate human input; they make it more meaningful.
When I see an analyst freed from hours of manual reporting to focus on strategy, or a team that now uses their Fridays for creative problem-solving instead of reconciliations, that’s when AI feels real.
We tend to imagine progress as a revolution: sudden, dramatic, irreversible. But in truth, it’s a series of small, steady improvements that eventually redefine what “normal” looks like. AI’s real power lies in that quiet transformation.
Closing thoughts
The AI industry will keep building bigger models, and those advances will remain important. But for most organizations, the frontier isn’t about scale; it’s about fit.
The systems that endure will be the ones that integrate easily, explain themselves clearly, and improve measurable outcomes without demanding cultural overhaul. They’ll be smaller, more adaptive, and deeply human in design.
That’s the future I’m building toward, one where AI is less of a spectacle and more of a partner. Not because it’s powerful, but because it works where work actually happens.
Komy A. is the Founder of Genta AI Solutions.
TNGlobal INSIDER publishes contributions relevant to entrepreneurship and innovation. You may submit your own original or published contributions subject to editorial discretion.